Meta’s historic loss in court could cost a lot more than $375 million

May 2, 2026

```json { "title": "Meta's $375M Loss Could Cost Billions More in Phase 2", "metaDescription": "New Mexico's Phase 2 trial against Meta begins May 4, 2026, seeking $3.7 billion and sweeping platform changes. Here's what's at stake for child safety.", "content": "A Santa Fe jury's historic $375 million verdict against Meta in March 2026 may turn out to be the least of the company's legal problems. On May 4, 2026, Phase 2 of State of New Mexico v. Meta Platforms, Inc. began before District Judge Bryan Biedscheid — a bench trial centered on whether Meta's platforms constitute a public nuisance under New Mexico law. If New Mexico prevails, the court could impose the most sweeping operational changes ever ordered against a major social media company, along with up to $3.7 billion in additional damages.\n\n<h2>What Phase 1 Established — and Why Phase 2 Could Be Far More Consequential</h2>\n\nIn March 2026, a Santa Fe jury found Meta liable for 75,000 violations of New Mexico's Unfair Practices Act, ordering the company to pay $375 million in civil penalties — the maximum allowed under state law at $5,000 per violation. The verdict covered misrepresentation of platform safety and unconscionable practices against approximately 37,500 New Mexico users, a figure representing roughly one-quarter of the state's teen population according to the most recent census data. New Mexico thereby became the first state in the nation to prevail at trial against a major tech company for harming young people.\n\nThe case originated in a 2023 undercover operation in which investigators from Attorney General Raúl Torrez's office created accounts on Facebook and Instagram posing as users younger than 14. Those accounts received sexually explicit material and were contacted by adults seeking similar content, leading to criminal charges against multiple individuals. The trial, which lasted approximately six to seven weeks, featured testimony from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram head Adam Mosseri.\n\nDuring the trial, New Mexico prosecutors revealed internal Meta messages discussing how Zuckerberg's 2019 decision to make Facebook Messenger end-to-end encrypted by default would impact the ability to disclose approximately 7.5 million child sexual abuse material reports to law enforcement.\n\nThe jury's verdict was significant. But by multiple measures — Meta's approximately $1.5 trillion market cap as of March 2026 and its reported $201 billion in revenue in 2025 — $375 million amounts to a fraction of the company's financial scale. Phase 2 is where that calculus could change dramatically.\n\nAttorney General Torrez framed the stakes plainly ahead of the Phase 2 proceedings: "It will be an opportunity for us to explore more deeply the size and scale and effectively the monetary value of the public nuisance harm that was a product of this business's behavior for the last, you know, 10 or 15 years."\n\n<h2>Phase 2: A $3.7 Billion Demand and Sweeping Platform Restrictions</h2>\n\nPhase 2 is a bench trial — meaning Judge Biedscheid, not a jury, will decide the outcome. According to Meta's own court filings, New Mexico plans to seek $3.7 billion in damages to fund a 15-year mental health plan, including new healthcare facilities and the hiring of mental health providers across the state.\n\nThe proposed injunction goes further. According to the New Mexico Department of Justice, the state is asking the court to order Meta to:\n\n<ul>\n<li>Ban addictive features including infinite scroll, autoplay, and engagement-optimizing recommendation algorithms on its platforms</li>\n<li>Disable push notifications during school hours and sleep hours</li>\n<li>Impose a hard monthly cap of 90 hours of platform access for all New Mexico minors across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp</li>\n<li>Achieve a 99 percent detection rate for new child sexual abuse material on its platforms</li>\n<li>Submit to oversight by a court-appointed Child Safety Monitor funded entirely by Meta</li>\n<li>Maintain these restrictions for a minimum of five years</li>\n</ul>\n\nTorrez described the Phase 2 proceedings as an opportunity for structural accountability: "We'll have an opportunity to present specific changes that we think need to be made in the core functionality of Meta's platforms."\n\nDistrict Judge Biedscheid rejected Meta's motion to postpone Phase 2 on April 9, 2026, clearing the way for the May 4 start date. Meta had attempted to delay the proceedings after losing Phase 1.\n\n<h2>Meta's Defense: Legal Shields, Technical Objections, and a Platform Withdrawal Threat</h2>\n\nMeta has pushed back on multiple fronts. In court filings, the company claimed there is no scientific evidence to support the idea that social media has caused mental health problems, and characterized many of the state's requests as "technologically impractical or completely impossible." A company spokesperson stated: "Despite Attorney General Torrez's claims, the State's demands are technically impractical, impossible for any company to meet and disregard the realities of the internet."\n\nMeta has also argued that it is shielded from liability by the free-speech protections of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act — arguments it has raised in numerous other child safety lawsuits across the country.\n\nIn perhaps its most striking response, Meta warned that if a workable solution to Attorney General Torrez's demands is not reached, it may have no choice but to remove access to its platforms for users in New Mexico entirely. Torrez did not back down: "Meta is showing the world how little it cares about child safety."\n\nA Meta spokesperson also sought to reframe the litigation's scope, saying: "The New Mexico Attorney General's focus on a single platform is a misguided strategy that ignores the hundreds of other apps teens use daily."\n\nFollowing Phase 1, the company issued a brief formal response: "We respectfully disagree with the verdict and will appeal."\n\n<h2>A Broader Legal Wave — and What New Mexico's Precedent Could Mean</h2>\n\nThe New Mexico case does not exist in isolation. According to Fortune, more than 40 state attorneys general have filed lawsuits against Meta over child safety. According to Reuters reporting cited by multiple outlets, more than 1,300 school districts have also filed lawsuits seeking court-ordered changes and damages under public nuisance law against Meta and other social media companies.\n\nA separate personal injury trial in Los Angeles Superior Court reached a verdict on March 25, 2026, finding both Meta and Google's YouTube negligent for designing apps that harmed kids and teens. The jury awarded $3 million in compensatory damages and $3 million in punitive damages, with Meta found 70% liable and YouTube 30% liable. Earlier in 2026, Snapchat and TikTok — previously named in the New Mexico lawsuit — reached settlements before trial.\n\nAt the federal level, at least 2,465 claims are pending in a multidistrict litigation overseen by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the Northern District of California as of April 2026. According to Meta's own filings with financial regulators, the company is separately facing thousands of lawsuits accusing it and other social media companies of intentionally designing their products to be addictive to young people, with some lawsuits seeking damages in the tens of billions of dollars.\n\nThe closing argument from the state's attorney during Phase 1 captured the core of New Mexico's case: "Over the course of a decade, Meta has failed over and over again to act honestly and transparently." — Linda Singer, attorney for the state of New Mexico.\n\nNew Mexico's Phase 1 victory — the first time a state has prevailed at trial against a major tech company on child safety grounds — gives other states a legal template and a proof of concept. Whether Phase 2 produces an enforceable injunction, a record damages award, or a negotiated settlement, the proceedings are being closely watched by plaintiffs, regulators, and the broader social media industry.\n\n<h2>What Comes Next</h2>\n\nPhase 2 is now underway before Judge Biedscheid. The central question is whether Meta's platforms meet the legal threshold for a public nuisance under New Mexico law — a finding that would give the court broad authority to mandate operational changes, not just financial penalties.\n\nMeta has indicated it will appeal the Phase 1 verdict. The Phase 2 proceedings will add another layer of legal complexity, particularly given the scale of what New Mexico is requesting: $3.7 billion in damages, algorithmic restrictions, access caps for minors, near-total CSAM detection requirements, and years of independent monitoring.\n\nThe outcome of Phase 2 will likely reverberate well beyond New Mexico. A successful public nuisance ruling — and any injunctive relief that survives appeal — could set a precedent that other states and courts follow. Conversely, a ruling in Meta's favor, or a successful appeal, could blunt the momentum of the broader national litigation wave.\n\nWhat is clear from the verified record is that the legal, financial, and reputational costs Meta faces from child safety litigation are still accumulating — and the New Mexico proceedings, now entering their most consequential phase, are at the center of it.\n\nFor more tech news, visit our <a href=\"/news\">news section</a>.\n\n<h2>Why This Matters for Your Health and Digital Life</h2>\n\nThe New Mexico trial is not just a legal story — it's a direct confrontation with questions about how platform design affects the mental health and wellbeing of young people. Features like infinite scroll, autoplay, and engagement-optimizing algorithms are not accidental design choices; they are built to maximize time on platform. Understanding how digital environments are engineered — and what accountability for those choices looks like — is increasingly relevant for anyone thinking seriously about screen time, focus, and mental health in 2026. At Moccet, we cover the intersection of technology, health, and productivity so you can make informed decisions about your digital life. <a href=\"/#waitlist\">Join the Moccet waitlist to stay ahead of the curve.</a>", "excerpt": "New Mexico's Phase 2 trial against Meta began May 4, 2026, with the state seeking $3.7 billion in damages and sweeping restrictions on platform features used by minors. The proceedings follow a historic March 2026 jury verdict that found Meta liable for 75,000 violations of state law and ordered $375 million in civil penalties — the first time any state prevailed at trial against a major tech company for harming young people. Phase 2's public nuisance claim could give the court authority to mandate the most far-reaching operational changes ever imposed on a social media platform.", "keywords": ["Meta child safety trial", "New Mexico Meta lawsuit", "social media public nuisance", "Meta $375 million verdict", "child safety social media 2026"], "slug": "meta-375-million-loss-phase-2-trial-new-mexico-child-safety" } ```

← Back to Tech News

More Tech News

Amazon stuck with months of repairs after drone strikes on data centers

Lutnick gets grilling on Nvidia chip sales to China in letter from Sen. Chris Coons

Meta Threatens to Exit New Mexico Amid Child Safety Trial